The field equations of Conformal Gravity (CG) are constructed from fourth-order derivatives of the metric. While the second-order field equations of General Relativity (GR) reduce to a second-order Poisson equation in the weak-field limit, those of CG yield a fourth-order one. Despite this, works by Tanhayi, Fathi, and Takook [Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2403 (2011)], Payandeh and Fathi [Int. J. Th. Phys. 51, 2227 (2012)], and Fathi, Olivares, and Villanueva [Galaxies 9, 43 (2021)] use second-order Poisson equations to generate purported solutions to CG in a weak-field limit. We demonstrate that these solutions are erroneous due to the use of second-order Poisson equations instead of appropriate fourth-order ones. We also point out other inconsistencies in the derivations of these metrics, such as the assertion that known CG (electro)vacuum solutions describe the interiors of matter distributions.