The Large Cancer Assistant (LCA): A Model-Agnostic Orchestration Framework for Scalable Clinical Decision Support in Oncology

Ghassen Marrakchi, Basarab Matei

Objective: Multimodal deep learning models in oncology are currently limited by monolithic designs that rigidly couple data ingestion, clinical routing, and artificial intelligence (AI) inference. To address this inflexibility, we propose the Large Cancer Assistant (LCA), a model-agnostic, post-hoc orchestration framework designed for scalable clinical decision support.
Methods: The LCA is mathematically formalized as a 7-tuple architecture grounded in the principle of Algorithmic Impermeability, ensuring the orchestration logic remains strictly independent of underlying black-box AI models. We introduce the Entry Theory, leveraging Geometric Deep Learning (GDL) to standardize multimodal patient data along distinct structural and medical axes. The system dynamically orchestrates data via a Cancer Switching Module and intentionally isolates the core AI execution from volatile hospital IT infrastructures by outputting a Standardized Intermediate Payload (SIP).
Results: A Proof of Concept (PoC) validated the orchestration logic across four technical scenarios. The framework executed a nominal flow with negligible orchestration overhead. It empirically demonstrated algorithmic impermeability by maintaining an invariant routing projection during AI model swaps, and it validated strict failure-safety by achieving a 100% recall rate in generating targeted Supplementary Data Requests (SDR) under injected data anomalies. Multi-protocol execution capability was also successfully verified.
Conclusion: By structurally decoupling multimodal ingestion from feature inference, the LCA provides a highly adaptable and modular orchestration foundation. The SIP establishes a clear architectural boundary, natively setting the stage for downstream Electronic Medical Record (EMR) interoperability as an independent future paradigm.

Gemini AI Research Brief

Unlock high-fidelity AI-curated research briefs summarizing key technical insights, one-line takeaways, and targeted industry applications.

Grounded technical summary & takeaways
Targeted real-world applications list
Native translation of all findings

Get Papermog Pro

In-App Reader

Source Document

Page 1 of 1

Open Source

Extracted Source Text

This view extracts readable text from the source document. Formatting, figures, and tables may not match the original PDF.

Loading page content...

30/100

Paper Trustworthiness Index

High Skepticism

Insufficient Evidence

This document should be treated with critical skepticism. It contains unverified scientific claims or was self-published.

Basic Heuristic Index: Detailed peer-review credibility signals, reproducibility audits, and technical reasoning breakdowns are locked. Subscribe to Papermog Pro to unlock.

Core Pillars Breakdown

Author Track Record18 / 25

Analyzing author profiles, historical publication count, and citation indices.

Technical Rigor22 / 30

Evaluating mathematical formulation, control baselines, and ablation studies.

Detailed Evidence Assessment

Verified Evidence & Citations

Claims verified by extracting matching contextual proof from cached document texts.

Unlock Detailed Credibility Report

Access deep verification metrics: peer-review validation, technical rigor breakdown, reproducibility checks, and detailed citation audits.

Unlock Pro Report